One of the least understood but most important concepts in tax is “incidence.”
If we impose a tax on A, it may be that A can pass the cost on to B. B may then be able to pass that cost on the C. And C may not be able to pass it on to anyone else. If so, we say that the “incidence” of the tax falls on C.
What this means is that A, nominally subject to the tax, may not ultimately bear the burden of the tax at all.
In 1990, for example, Congress enacted a 10% tax on luxury items – luxury cars, yachts, private planes, jewelry, and furs. The idea was to tax the “rich” without increasing top income tax rates.
What happened instead was that demand for items subject to the tax – yachts, for example – went down. To continue selling yachts, therefore, yachtmakers had to cut prices. In other words, they had to eat the tax. Yachtmakers, in turn, responded by cutting wages. It turned out that luxury yachts were generally made in small towns without employment alternatives. So when yachtmakers cut wages, workers had no other place to go. They had to accept the pay cuts.
Bottom line: the cost of this so-called “luxury” tax ended up being borne primarily by low-income workers.
The incidence of a tax depends on the alternatives the various players have. The player with the fewest choices generally bears the incidence of the tax.
The “rich,” it turns out, can do without yachts. Yachtmakers, on the other hand, cannot do without customers. And yachtmakers’ workers have no choices at all.
This is why taxes on individual income make at least some sense. If an income tax is well-structured (admittedly a big if), to avoid the tax you have to do without income. Most folks like income. And therefore most folks end up bearing the share of the income tax nominally imposed on them. They generally can’t pass it on to someone else.
(This is not always true of businesses, but that’s a topic that merits its own discussion.)
In my next post, I will apply the concept of incidence to other types of government action – tax “cuts,” for example. It turns out that a tax “cut” for A may create costs for B. In effect, B bears the cost of the tax “cut.” From a devious politician’s perspective, the wonderful thing is that B has no clue. From an honest politician’s perspective, the problem is that Congress often has no clue either.
Professor, the yachtmakers may have received unemployment benefits, derived from my remittals to the fisc. The benefits went right back into the commerce stream paying for the goods and the taxes levied on every transaction. Possibly, the dollars yachmakers spent on food ended back in their pocket through the tax collection streams. In turn, I was taxed to provide the benefits to the yachtmakers - bearing the burden. Because of income tax, I am expecting my employer to pay me more, and the employer, in turn charges the customers more. It seems that the cycle touches everyone: Where is the incidence? What am I missing?
Posted by: Kat | August 11, 2008 at 03:27 PM
Kat,
Your question is very perceptive. To find the answer, we need to focus on why we undertake incidence analysis in the first place. Incidence analysis is used by government to assess the unintended effects of its actions. This implies that we should at least pause in our analysis whenever we bump into another government decision point.
In the case of the luxury tax, for example, we might trace the effects of the tax down to the level of the workers in the yacht yards. Whether to continue to give them unemployment benefits is a separate decision, itself subject to incidence analysis. So we can usefully stop at that point and ask whether we really think the luxury tax is doing what we want it to do.
If the answer is No, we may want to repeal the tax (which is what Congress actually did). Either way, we have the option of continuing our analysis along the lines you suggest.
In the case of the luxury tax, the whole purpose was to tax the "rich" without raising rates. Once it became apparent that the tax wasn't going to accomplish that purpose, there was no point in tracing the effects of the tax any further.
Posted by: Theodore Seto | August 12, 2008 at 09:54 AM
Professor,
While incidence is an essential aspect of tax analysis, we cannot forget that all taxes have a net social cost. In econospeak, taxes create a "dead weight loss." Thus, it's not just a matter of figuring out who pays the tax, but the overall impact on society. In other words, incidence is only part of the story. It may well be that a tax won't get "paid" by anyone because it completely stifled the market in that area.
Taxes, as you point out, may prevent yachts from being produced at all. Both yacht consumers, and yacht producers, are harmed by such a tax.
But that's not the end of the story, either. While taxes cause a host of problems, one that is ofter overlooked is that taxes shift production and consumption patterns. Whereas before the tax, market prices directed resources according to consumer preferences--leading to optimal use of scarce resources--the imposition of a tax channels resources to other areas. When resources are diverted from their best use, based on consumer preferences, society as a whole loses because scarce resources are used less efficiently.
Posted by: Eric | August 18, 2008 at 07:51 AM
Eric,
I agree with everything you say. Incidence is only part of the story, and not always the most important part. It is, however, one of the least understood -- which is why I'm writing about it.
Posted by: Theodore Seto | August 18, 2008 at 09:59 AM
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Posted by: Volker from Germany | March 31, 2010 at 12:52 PM
I am interested in starting a retail business where the customer
selects a stuffed animal and then stuffs it on site. I would like to
know where I can buy unstuffed bears, other unstuffed animals and
stuffed animal clothing at wholesale prices preferrably from an
overseas supplier. Please provide at least 6 wholesalers/manufacturers.
Posted by: propecia | April 29, 2010 at 01:19 PM
The exercise is undoubtedly the best and most healthy way to weight loss and fat, but over time have developed products that help make this more effectively and expeditiously, it is to maintain a balanced diet, a healthy eating and daily exercise, excellent topic.
Posted by: hydroxycut | April 29, 2010 at 02:14 PM
Luckily to enter your blog and read your article. I have lots of feeling after sharing your blog. Of course, I also welcome you can come to my website. Good luck! Thank you!
Posted by: New Jordans | May 11, 2010 at 12:03 AM
Cars are my passion, I grew up in the middle of six brothers and I were born there this passion, I love to visit blogs here.
Kathleen T. Ryan
Lane Tecumsah 3209
Cedar Rapids, IA 52 401
Posted by: viagra online | May 21, 2010 at 03:53 PM
I've been one of your major follower this year... your brilliant and educative post really beats my imaginations each time drop by to read blogs... i say keep the good work
Posted by: Acai Berry Optimum | May 26, 2010 at 06:10 PM
hi guys ... I really enjoyed reading this blog so interesting ... congratulations for writing such quality material. I would love to receive more information about
5 Who Pays Taxes: The Concept of "Incidence," Part I
Posted by: costa rica hotels | June 08, 2010 at 12:13 AM
Costa Rica is an excellent country to invest in real estate its economy is very stable, being a peaceful country and have their exuberant nature makes it much more attractive to invest
Posted by: costa rica best investment | July 28, 2010 at 05:21 PM
Well greetings fellas thanks for the opportunity of post a message , also i would like to know more about healthy food is very interesting , how can i get more information about it , I want to sign up for more details.
This isn't even close to being true. Please follow the Raw Data link and look at the Bureau of Labor Statistics Current CES Economic News Release - Employment Situation Summary and you will see that it cannot possibly be correct. Beware you coolaid drinkers, you are taking us all down with you.
Posted by: viagra online | August 18, 2010 at 12:22 PM
Great article though so thanks it's very interesting you did lot of research before posting any new content.
Posted by: cheap moncler coats | September 28, 2010 at 05:49 PM
Of course, I also welcome you can come to my website. Good luck! Thank you!
Posted by: Tiffany Jewelry | October 26, 2010 at 06:16 PM
I hate taxes but that's the price of being in such a great country. USA :D
Posted by: stock ideas | November 26, 2010 at 01:57 PM
the music you listen to all influence the way you think and feel about yourself and the world around you.
Posted by: discount timberland boots | December 06, 2010 at 07:15 AM
Able to work under high pressure and time limitation with leadership quality.
Posted by: Cheap Jordan shoes | December 14, 2010 at 10:47 PM
Easy healthy diets effortlessly fit your lifestyle. Begin your baby steps toward a healthier lifestyle, a slimmer waistline, and greater self-confidence.
Posted by: buy kratom online | January 06, 2011 at 06:59 AM
Priests of the Druid religion of ancient (to) Britain and France believed mistletoe had magical powers.
Posted by: Cheap Coach Bags | January 11, 2011 at 07:50 PM
Begin your baby steps toward a healthier lifestyle, a slimmer waistline, and greater self-confidence.
Posted by: football customized jerseys | January 19, 2011 at 05:35 PM
Someone reported the sign to Starbucks after walking into Boulders Coffee Lounge, thinking it was part of the Seattle-based chain.
Posted by: Nike Shox For Cheap | February 14, 2011 at 05:18 PM
http://wpfc11.blog.com/
Posted by: snowlin | March 09, 2011 at 12:07 AM
In all large businesses, and people began to look like before you like a thousand police, as the time, http://www.nikedunks-high.com/ but during that time to seize the opportunity, as the Buddhist goddess of God.
Posted by: nike dunks | April 30, 2011 at 07:51 PM
Skönt att vara besöka din blogg igen, har det varit månader för mig. Väl här artikeln som jag har väntat så länge. Jag behöver den här artikeln för att slutföra mitt uppdrag i kollegiet, och den har samma tema med din artikel. Tack, bra aktie.!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Kamagra | May 02, 2011 at 04:18 AM